Every time I hear someone say ‘eh’ in a questioning tone or to mean ‘um actually’ I lose my shit. Or even just to play something down.

Like I literally come to hate the person instantly. Its a very strong feeling on a very small sound.

Instant downvotes if I see it on Lemmy too. HATE IT.

How about all y’all?

  • Vupware@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Instead of “et cetera”, the speaker says something akin to “dut da da”. Drives me crazy!

  • 315am@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I call it as I see it.”

    “I’m just very straightforward and honest.”

    No, you’re a prick. That’s what you are.

  • Acamon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    could care less’ instead of “couldn’t”. I know it’s just a regional / generational difference, I don’t really care about being a prescriptivist or that my way is more “logical”. Phrases and idioms can be stupid and counterintuitive. But that 's said, it bugs the living hell out of me, and I instantly think anyone using it is an ignorant dumbass.

    • jaycifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      If I cared any less I’d have to start thinking about how little I care, and I don’t care enough for that.

      • Acamon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Quite so. Isn’t there an Internet law that you can never post something pedantic about language without making a typo or other error?

    • Krudler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      The phrase was used decades ago to be somewhat of a dismissal or threat.

      As in I care so little already, do you want me to care even less which will be not at all?

      “Dad! You don’t care about my hamster!”

      “I could care less…” (bitch again and the next stop for hammy is the freezer)

      • tomenzgg@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Like people who complain about “literally” being used hyperbolically, I’m always a tad concerned that someone wasn’t able to discern this to the point of making that inability known publicly.

        Gonna bookmark this; it’s a great explanation.

        • Krudler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          This is the only place (Lemmy) that I’ve informed people and wasn’t met with a series of condescending lectures from kids. Shocked I have no downvotes actually!

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    When talking politics:

    “It’s plain as day” “Common sense” “I don’t know about that” “We all know” “It’s just natural” “Normal” “Everybody (verbs) (x)”

    Like that kind of stuff irks me in normal conversations but when we are talking about something that is part of common debate, obviously it’s fucking not already known “common sense”, and dismissing evidence that clearly contradicted it by saying “I don’t about that” or similar just sends me.

    It’s a problem with trolls, strangers, and even loved ones for me. It’s just wild

  • NerdyKeith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 days ago

    “No offence, but …” followed by an insult.

    Or starting off with an insult, then ending it with “Just saying …”

    As if these phrases nullify being a dick. If you’re going to be an asshole, own it. Don’t make excuses up.

  • jaycifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Most people think ___.” No, unless you’re citing a statistic or roughly quantifying how many anecdotes you’ve heard agreeing with you to support that statement (both of which rarely happen), that’s just your opinion wrapped up in language to avoid actually justifying it.

    Additionally, even if most people think something, I don’t care what most people think. In my experience what most people think vs what the best thing to think is are often not aligned.

  • Darohan@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Common sense” when it actually means “something you would know if you’d lived my exact life”. There are very few things in this world that are actually “common sense”, and to be honest the whole concept should just be removed from cultures in which it is present.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    I literally dislike it whenever anyone uses the word literally when they clearly mean figuratively.

    Its just extra syllables to lie to me.

    • tal@olio.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      There’s this process in language where intensifiers — words that amplify the strength of the meaning of the rest of the phrase — tend to become used in areas that they aren’t really truly appropriate in and thus “weaken” in meaning.

      So, for example, “awesome” once truly meant “awe-inspiring”, but it’s been used enough in weaker senses the past several decades here in California that it doesn’t really mean that any more. It just means “very good” now.

      I don’t think that the Brits do that with “awesome” — or at least not as much — but they like to use “colossally” in a similar way.

      The above Wikipedia link has a list of intensifiers, including “literally”, and you can probably recognize a bunch of them that have “weakened”.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      As I said in another comment, it isn’t just using it incorrectly that’s annoying, it’s also using it unnecessarily. People use “literally” for emphasis in sentences where no adverb is needed. It should only be used if you are clarifying that you mean literally when the sentence could otherwise be interpreted as figurative

      • blackbrook@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        It’s just become a stylistic habit. People do it in imitation of what they hear everyone else do. This actually makes it even more annoying to me, though I know this is just instinctive human behavior.

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Give something 110%”

    Fuck no! 100% is the max. Even that is often too much to ask. Also, what’s in it for me? Your appreciation huh? Well fuck you.

    “I have a challenge for you”.

    No you don’t. You have a problem and want to make it mine. Piss off.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      I am going through peoples replies sorta laughing to myself but what you have is the closest thing to something that irritates me. honestly 110 is like all the think out of the box bussiness speak to actualize externalities and such.

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 days ago

    In writing: “A Masterclass in X” to describe some sort of exemplary behavior. Hate hate hate seeing it.

    I’m more forgiving with spoken language, but agree with the use of “literally” to mean “figuratively”, it bothers me.

    And in niche hairstyling lingo I hate when people use the word “micro-plopping” to describe scrunching or blotting with a cloth, because that technique precedes the word by at least 25 years, it wasn’t invented recently and didn’t need a new word. Plopping is tying your wet hair up in a cloth in a accordioned arrangement for awhile, and scrunching is just scrunching. What they are describing is better explained by saying they blotted with a cloth and/or scrunched with a cloth.

  • Sheridan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    “It is what it is”. This cliche is symptomatic of learned helplessness and only serves to protect the status quo against any sort critical analysis and reform.

    • Maeve@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s sad you feel that way. We can’t magically change the weather today, it is what it is. But if we keep pressuring businesses and politicians, we may be able to mitigate it for future generations.

      • Sheridan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I was thinking of it more in a work context where when I question why some old and very inefficient work flow can’t be optimized in some way, I get that cliche in response.

        • Maeve@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It means whomever is above them is perceived as rigid. Maybe they are, maybe not. Do a POC in spare time and present it. Maybe something will come of it, maybe not. Either way, it is what it is.

          Something I recently read when researching the tetragrammaton in Judaism, the name doesn’t necessarily mean just, “I am that I am,” it also means, “I am becoming that which I am becoming.” And things seldom look exactly in 3D as I picture them in my head or on paper. So it’s an interesting concept.

          I don’t recall the site, some Jewish site about the rabbinical reasoning or translation.

      • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        pressuring businesses and politicians doesn’t matter much if the people themselves are living their lives in a hypocritical way.

          • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t. doesn’t mean that like 90% of the people around me aren’t living that way thought.

            I’d go so far as to say American culture at least, is inherently hypocritical and to be a’ good american’ you have to live a life of deep hypocracy.

            • Maeve@kbin.earth
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              When I realize how difficult it can be to control myself, choosing a fruit over candies or cookies when that sweet tooth hits hard, I realize the folly of controlling my neighbors and focus on myself.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pretty context dependant. Some things you can’t change and have to deal with, so it is what it is. We got shit tools but the work needs to be done now so it is what it is.

    • 2piradians@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fully agree, it contributes nothing but impotence. I make a habit of saying “we’re stuck with this unless…”

      Sometimes change is impossible, but not nearly as often as this defeated little phrase gets thrown around.