“don’t how they work” misunderstands what scientist mean when they say that (also intentional misdirection from marketing in order to build hype). We know exactly how it works, you describe down to physics if needed, BUT at different levels of abstration in the precense of really world inputs the out puts are novel to us.

Its predicting words that come after words. The “training” is inputing the numerical representation of words and adjusting variables in the algorythem until the given mathmatical formula creates the same outputs as inputs within a given margin of error.

When you cat I say dog. When some says what are they together we say “catdog” or “pets”. Randomness is added so that the algorythem can say either even if pets is majority answer. Make the string more complicated and that randomness gives more oppertunity for weird answers. The training data could also just have lots of weird answers.

Little mystery here. The interesting “we dont know how it works” is that these outputs give such novel output that is unlike the inputs sometimes to the degree it seems like it reasons. Even though again it does not

Removed by mod

The fact that strikes are illegal and against capitalists implies the state is protecting capitalist intetests and not worker interests.

Then why would there still be so many examples of workers effectivally saying otherwise despite the legal risk?

Removed by mod

My point still is that if the working class fighting for better conditions for themselves is illegal the state is not on their side. Which by the numbers it is.

This is just an example of it but is part of larger trend of extreme (worse than the US on rights is extreme) worker explotation and supression.

Im not seeing what you are saying represented in the link you provided.

Groups like CLB are saying that the strikes they are tracking are illegal strikes because the official unions are not acts on the demands of their members. Basically the sole source ive found and that you have shared. We seem to have no data to point that says otherwise.

The steelman version of what you present to me is that China has no need for strikes and that all reporting on strikes is false. Implying every group of workers in China are content to live and die in service to States ambitions as all interpersonal conflict between employer and employees is mediated without fail in some other system besides collective barganing and worker’s demostrations of solidarity.

Am i to believe that AND that China a safe place for foreign investment as is also claimed by the CCP? And if so, how?

In general the concept is that related buyers have a right to be informed but anyone else in the market. So if you were to buy stake in a private company during that youd have the right to the books during that sale and covering that is fraud.

Kind of like how buisnesses would have no right to know how much equity i have unless it was relevent to any actual agreement.

Not saying i think its right way or better but i dont see total transparency of details not related to a direct sale and the partipants to be necceray for a market to be “free”.

You do see why the argument that strikes are rarely allowed but conveintly thats ok because they are needed or wanted isnt very convicing right?

I can seem to find numbers supporting that are a rise in strikes which line up with the global trend of economic unrest, I can not find numbers suggesting what you are saying though, and instead you seem to be suggesting that yes there is an increase of illegal strikes but no body actually or needs them because the states interests are the peoples interests. That seems inconcruent to the data showing that people are in fact striking. Which is why i was asking about different data sources. Id take non-english data sources as well to be honest. Translatinh the label and methods may take some effort but i can Arabic Numerals in almost any context.

You’ve shared this picture twice, but i cant find the study related to it.

Do you have better sources on tracking strikes in mainland China? The only other places i found info were US finance reporting on as a mattet of investment concern.

Force Tor requests! Nice if you want to be sure your stuff isnt leaking data"

IPFS gate ways! IPFS is just really cool way to decrentalize storage (with metadata support making it a little longer living then a torrent link).

Nearby downloads! Nice when you want to share an app with a friend but internet is spotty.

Tracking antifeatures! I love that i can filter out network service dependcy or non-foss

I the fruity one, find there are more women i talk to that like me more than not. Im not plenty of womens cup of tea im sure, but im not interested in plenty of women too.

Lomg and short of it, yeah we’re out here doing fine. Gender is part of a performative identity so wr are goinh to see shows all the time, people, like myself, tend to value other identity expression and so you probally wont see us performing counter gender as much (id rather talk about Linux, Rancher, FOSS, homesteading, economics, etc instead of dwelling a lot of normative gender dynamics that dont explain me and my partner(s) well.

That is not the data i am finding https://chinaworker.info/en/2024/03/30/44910/ Even within the link you provided (which seems vastly more interested in national state interests than workers interests).

Do you have some major examples where a legal strike was allowed to happen? From what i can tell illegal strikes happen are often not fully procecuted (Heaven is high and the emperor is far away after all) but legal strikes from the sanctioned ACFTU do not seem common, im guessing because of the top down structure of the org, but i could be mistaken there.

I guess to be more specific are worker led unions that facilate collective bargening or activities like strikes legal in the majority of China yet? Or are they limited to the role of special interest political action group still.

The phrase that triggered my “completly board talking about” was right after saying a setup i see as awesome you say “which seems ok to me”. This also seems inline with other dutch political takes ive seen, from bikes to red light districts to work place norms, where i see what would be a hotly talked about topic (both support and opposition) here in the US for me, is largely plainly talked about.

I cant say its wrong, as i seem to agree with coorolated polices, but it just seems in stark contrast to the American tendency to make this higher stakes and more exciting.

The closer government is something that makes alot of sense to me too. I find municple, town, county level politics much more grounded then my federal level decisions (which is more like EU scoped politics to me in comparison at about half the population but about the same land mass). State level, which an average of almost 6 million being represented by the goverment vs the 350 million the fed size has to represent, also seems more reasonable though in terms of action very limited.

I know one reform here id like is to expand the number of federal representives here to be scaled with population again. It was orginally scaled at 1 for every 30 thousand (which feels like a human scale of representation), but including our upper house its around 750,000 per elected member of congress.

Is unionzation legal in the majority of China now?

It depends on why. Is it a blind obedence to law, i.e. any law breaking is considered immoral to you? I.e. you oppose speeding, jaywalking, hiding Ann Frank just as much. No, probally not. That is a different issue called Statism.

After that you’d have to get into the countries actual laws and what their intentions and effects are. Is it just a matter of getting documented and agreeing to follow laws and participate in society and people are bypassing that in order to shirk accountabilty? No thats not racist.

Is it because there is a quota based on country of origin in order to shape demographics and so people desperate to move cant do so legally? Yeah, that’s probally racist (with current demographics of the world largly affected by a few centuries of racist policy, both colonial and domestic).

https://shop.fairphone.com/the-fairphone-gen-6-e-operating-system is an option

Computer. Another silcon beast joins the herd (Rancher Harvester HCI cluster).