

I did not come up with the argument and I have actually no clue how important eyebrows are in a criminal case
I did not come up with the argument and I have actually no clue how important eyebrows are in a criminal case
You say reasonable doubt. Who is saying this?
Yeah I think we all are on the same page about what monster the CEO was
Hmm, not so sure about the innocence, imho. Also the photos I saw look very much like him. But I am a layman and open for arguments.
I am however curious about the eyebrows-argument. Is there maybe a video or blog, where someone with a background of crime investigation analyzes the provided screen caps and other evidence?
Edit: imagine downvoting an opinion you don’t like, instead of actually answering the question and helping understand the situation. This is not even a debate lmao
I really appreciate the time and effort you put into this. Thank you a lot.
Thanks for elaborating. Wouldn’t it make more sense to just say “don’t even reply, as I will not read it anyways, as I have blocked you”? And how does this strategy make them any different, compared to the ones you call bad faith actors?
Someone will be the last poster, you cannot avoid this. I understand how the strategy of having the final word works. I just would like to understand what to do against that strategy properly.
Please block me. I don’t like attacking you. But I also dislike random threats for no reason. What are you trying to achieve with this announcement? Are you trying to scare others off? Are you afraid of replies? Because you would read the reply anyways first, before blocking.
Well, humans can act weird, especially under heavy stress. You usually don’t just kill someone for the very first time and shrug it off. However, I do actually not know when and where they found the evidence. If the manifest was handwritten, then it is quite easy to find out if he wrote it.