Apple is such a piece of shit company.

Learn how to compete without behaving anti competitively or quit your fucking jobs. It’s not complicated.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Yes, but a dashcam is already pushing the limits of getting a decent wide view camera that can see far away, and it’s substantially larger than the one embedded in the glasses, and is fixed on the dash right near the windshield, making it much less susceptible to both movement and effects like glare / reflections.

I understand the gripes about Meta, but I don’t understand how everyone clowns on this like the core concept is stupid or unwanted.

Easy $1000 sell: cycling / escooter accessory. People already regularly buy expensive sport glasses just for sun and wind protection. With a smart version of them like this, you add open ear headphone, and you add the potential for navigation directions, or even a Bluetooth rear view camera on the back of your helmet to get a virtual mirror.

Short answer, no. Cameras are still much worse than the human eye, especially once this small.

It would be really nice if every country would enact digital privacy laws so that Meta’s business model was just forced to be better. They genuinely have some of the best and most accessible VR/AR hardware available.

It would of course be nicer if a more ethical competitor stepped up in a serious way but no one seems that interested. It’s interesting that the vast majority of Meta’s business model is being extremely good at copying or buying out competitors but with VR they’re basically the only ones actually sinking serious money into making it a thing.

You realize that when you speak up just to ask other people to use your specific definition of a word, you’re the one getting lost in pedantic semantics, and that can also be addressed by you not doing that, right?

Because once it has a name, it makes it easier to describe and reference in research literature, and thus makes it easier to draw conclusions on.

Everything has some super specific name that professionals in some field use for it because they regularly need to distinguish it from other similar thing that the broader public does not care about.

Do you think a) the CTO / marketing department accidentally published a video that let slip that they have backdoors into every headset that they use to remote control them, or b) by ‘every headset in the building’ he meant ‘every headset in the auditorium’?

Also, this is a meta presentation, presumably happening on their campus, is there even anything else in that building, or is it just a dedicated auditorium like they have on the apple campus?

It’s literally just Occam’s razor.

Yeah man, you can already do that by blasting ‘hey siri’.

lmfao yeah bro, he did. Learn how the English language works.

Oooohh nooo look, that guy walking by just stole my Wifi name and Bluetooth information, how scary 👻! /S

So an Android or iOS phone?

So they’re phones that people hold slightly more vertically?

It’s a company with no morals, but the product isn’t stupid, and neither is the way the company operates or the people who run it.

Don’t underestimate your adversary.

How are smart glasses evil?

No, he said that when the audio command came over the speakers, it triggered the smart glasses of everyone in the auditorium.