More fun if you go via the neck

So who do you stand with?

That having been said I don’t actually know why you’re responding to me. It sounds like you have some kind of actual evidence backing up your beliefs (whatever those beliefs may be) which means you don’t fall into the category of stupid we were discussing.

It makes the road surface slicker, as I said.

Nowhere did I support Texas

Nowhere did I say the way that crosswalks are is bad

I said maybe having a slicker than usual stretch of road leading up to a crosswalk would be bad, which isn’t what’s happening

What’s more, you literally have a response next to mine on this subthread where you are clearly in agreement with me.

https://vger.to/lemmy.myserv.one/comment/16401772

Based on a sample of 1, we have determined that the human race should no longer exist.

Goodbye

Your words say leaders but your words say not leaders

Another solid argument that gets right to the real point of all this.

Makes sense, thanks for the explanation

No, he said everything else is some type of castle. I looked this castle up and it aligns well with the idea that he’s trying to shut down the other claims without considering them.

From the wiki:

where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the “motte”) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the “bailey”)

So he’s technically saying that the rest of the post is modest claims which are easy to defend, ie he agrees with Y. (I’m assuming the bailey is genocide and the motte is the claims of ethnic cleansing w/out genocide)

deleted by creator

I personally think a better question is what are you trying to get out of posting this? I mean if you want someone to tell you what a good lefty you are you can always go on buzzfeed, so what’s the goal here?

🍆💦😜

Removed by mod

That’s too bad, because neither of those is the case. I personally think your attempt to kill the conversation above with your “stop typing” and again now with this comment is an actually an attempt to hide your head in the sand, but I guess we’ll never know.

Valuable addition. I ask “why is that inference wrong” and you say “no”.

If there’s a permanent global fingerprint code isn’t that, well, the opposite of what the marketing says? Why is that not a unique user identifier?

I didn’t compare it to signal. I just asked if that was the facts of the situation.

If I were to compare it might be to the topic of this thread which I can self host and thus control.

However, since you opened the door on signal I’d comment that the entire signal org would have to go down for that to happen, not just a few servers. Is simplex managed by a large well funded entity that is unlikely to fail or are the servers more mom & pop setups? What happens if Kurt Cobain wakes up one morning and shuts down his server?

Well then why did you say the rest of the post of the person you’re responding to doesn’t matter? You did say that, didn’t you? You told them to stop and that their argument is faulty, but didn’t deny the actual claims. That implies to me you don’t care. If you do care, you did an extremely poor job of showing it by telling them to stop talking.

So if the above is so completely off base, why don’t you continue your argument with the poster above?

So there is nothing you haven’t seen with your own eyes but acknowledge exists?

That’s the only argument we’re discussing here.

Seems that way. Person 2 above said “it’s not x but it is y”, person above said “you can stop at it’s not x” implying to me they are fine with “but it is y”. What’s wrong with that inference?