

Why doesn’t
Hamas orIsrael just meet at a predetrmined place and time and just have out or kill the crap out of each other? Instead of involving civs who don’t have anything to do with war?
Why doesn’t
Hamas orIsrael just meet at a predetrmined place and time and just have out or kill the crap out of each other? Instead of involving civs who don’t have anything to do with war?
I think it’s an attempt at an anti-truth what-aboutism, which Mike Johnson failed to come up with and accidentally agreed.
So your point is that Johnson only agrees that he’s unwell, but not unhinged? Also, your example isn’t even close to the same flow of conversation. He didn’t reply with a deflection, he literally said “And some people on your side are too”. Whether he intended to agree or not is debatable, but his statement is absolutely agreeing because he used the word “too” AND didn’t mention anything completely unrelated like in your example.
I politely disagree, saying “too” is as blatant of an agreement as he could’ve said. He tried to deflect, but failed and agreed.
LMAO, reading the submissions on that website are hilarious. Three quarters of the posts on there are super level-headed, saying they don’t believe he should have died but they can’t mourn or feel sympathy for someone so horrible; IMO, Charlie Kirk absolutely deserved to die. Wanting fascists dead shouldn’t be a hot take, it should be the norm.
With my tax money… and only a negative impact on the average americans life…
I guess it’s steganography, but the message is stored within the same format as the message itself?