All of this user’s content is licensed under CC BY 4.0.
[…]There will be alteration.[…]
I’m not claiming that there wouldn’t be some form of alteration — I’m just seeking the minimum amount of alterations as is pragmatically possible (ie avoiding something to this extent [1]).
[…] Why would you WANT interlaced video?
I want the freedom to choose the dienterlacing technique [1] when I deinterlace.
The fact that you think you need the option at all is enough. […]
Could you clarify what you mean? I’m not sure I follow.
TikTok To Be Sold To Trump’s Right Wing Billionaire Buddies And Converted Into A Propaganda Mill [1.1]
The title feels misinformative to me given, the following from the article:
[…] Trump insiders claim to be zeroing in on a deal that would sell 80% of TikTok’s U.S. assets to […] [1.2]
To me, the title infers that TikTok is being sold with certainty, whereas the content of the article sates that a deal has yet to even be reached.
TikTok To Be Sold To Trump’s Right Wing Billionaire Buddies And Converted Into A Propaganda Mill
Do you mind referencing some of the exceptions that you have in mind to the aforementioned rule?
I just try to keep the mnemonic “I before E except after C” [1] in my brain.
recieve vs. receive
[…] Second thing is getting a capture card that records the resulting 1080p och 720p output from the ADC. I got a relatively cheap one which then plugs into the pc with usb-a. […]
I want to capture interlaced — not progressive [2][1]. I don’t want any deinterlacing done by the capture card [3].
[…] Early HDTVs supported the progressively-scanned resolutions of 480p and 720p with 1080p displays available at higher cost. […]
1080p (1920 × 1080 progressively displayed pixels […]
Deinterlacing is the process of converting interlaced video into a non-interlaced or progressive form. […]
[…] First thing to do is to convert the analogue signal to hdmi. […]
Why? What’s wrong with directly capturing composite? I have yet to come across an HDMI capture card that doesn’t process the signal in some way (eg no upscaling, no deinterlacing). I’m doing this for archival purposes so I want the signal as unadulterated as possible. This also includes these sorts of transformations you mention:
[…] After that i setup a scene with the capture card as source and transform the output using obs to get the resolution, size and format i want. […]
[…] Whatever signal you are receiving in obs wont need deinterlacing, unless the capture device is bad at its job. […]
As I mentioned in my post, I have deinterlacing disabled. I don’t want to deinterlace.
Would Satan be a conservative?