Knowing the template, this actually does make sense. The first three are ones where it’s super clear that you’d have to be quite stupid to fall for it. Then the fourth one, a lot of people wouldn’t immediately realise you have to be stupid to fall for them, but it’s stupid to fall for them nonetheless.

True to the meme format, the point isn’t that it isn’t stupid to fall for the first three. It clearly is. But falling for the fourth one is stupid, too.

(though I must admit, the selection of some of the examples is pretty weird)

That’s a very good and respectful way of solving the issue, thank you for sharing!

How does facial recognition work without recording the faces it’s supposed to recognise?

Not a false dilemma at all. I’m not comfortable with being recorded onto some rando’s hard drive either. It’s still recording and tracking me against my consent.

I have this, and I cannot stress enough how much this use case is not worth being recorded and tracked in public against my consent

Am I understanding correctly that you’re saying nobody gets to feel unsafe as long as there’s someone who’s even more unsafe? Or are you saying something else?

Why would Syria et al. provide asylum to trans people fleeing the US?

Literally the first thing about what you’re trying to say. Like, I’m not following at all, can you explain what youre trying to say with the above comment?

Would you kindly share with us what your point is?

Do you folks not know that two things can be bad at the same time

Everyone should be protected from having their consent violated, regardless of how despicable of a human they are. Human rights extend to all. The right to consent is non negotiable. We should just guillotine them instead. Quick and painless, but gruesome enough to set a good example.