Thank you for citing sources, remarkable that there is statistically an interaction. I wonder what other common phenomena people may be in denial about?
- 0 Posts
- 5 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
Cake day: September 15th, 2025
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Bonson@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.zip•Motion sensors in high-performance mice can be used as a microphone to spy on users, thanks to AI — Mic-E-Mouse technique harnesses mouse sensors, converts acoustic vibrations into speechEnglish1·9 days agoNah security is important to me and I like wireless mice. That’s a false dichotomy you proposed. But thanks for speaking for me, your smugness added a lot to the conversation.
Bonson@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.zip•Motion sensors in high-performance mice can be used as a microphone to spy on users, thanks to AI — Mic-E-Mouse technique harnesses mouse sensors, converts acoustic vibrations into speechEnglish21·9 days agoDeal breaker would be that it’s wired. Cool mouse, I’d love to get it when it’s wireless.
Bonson@sh.itjust.worksto Technology@lemmy.world•AI chatbots that butter you up make you worse at conflict, study findsEnglish2·10 days agoSo go in there and say what you did to someone else actually was done to you and compare results. I’ve had good success getting advice if you regenerate from both perspectives.
Yes I’m aware, I have a degree in the field. Nothing in my sentence would indicate that I don’t understand. I’m agreeing that it’s statistically biased towards the speaker, therefore, you can work to lazily normalize the result by investing the input.