She’s embarked on a nationwide tour with Vermont’s Independent Senator Bernie Sanders, held town halls outside of her district in upstate New York, and raised $15 million

Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a progressive who has cemented her popularity with young voters, is reportedly considering running for president or the Senate in 2028.

Ocasio-Cortez, 35, made a splash when she was elected to represent New York’s 14th congressional district, located in the Bronx and Queens, in 2019. Now, the Democrat is reportedly considering taking the next step in her political career as the party searches for its next generation of leaders, Axios reported Friday.

Members of Ocasio-Cortez’s team have recently been positioning the progressive lawmaker, known as AOC, to either run for president or run for a Senate seat.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    49 minutes ago

    She’s not actually. I don’t think she’s that stupid as to think she’d be able to overcome the bias of the democratic party establishment in just 2 years. What’s she and Bernie are trying to do is galvanize the apathetic left into standing up and fighting rather than just sitting on social media and complaining about how everything sucks. What is needed is huge numbers of people to come out and vote like their lives depend on it (cause they do).

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      if Gavin Newsome becomes the democratic front runner, Bernie Sanders coming to my house to convince me, in person, to vote for him would fail. sorry but i am one too many neo liberal canidate spent. it will never happen again.

    • S0ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 minutes ago

      I think you mean she can’t “win”. She can absolutely run. I bet it will even be close!

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      He’ll be 78, it would be reasonable for him to retire when his term is up in 2028. Hopefully the fiascos with Biden and multiple Democratic Representatives dying of old age this term (and the Republican Representative who went missing because her family put her in assisted living), and just slightly further back Feinstein being too sick to make critical votes, all push people to stop hanging on to their seats all the way to the bitter end. Pelosi leading the way here, showing it can be done.

    • very_well_lost@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Any democrat who runs on a populist message that doesn’t just pander to working Americans can win the presidency… just not the primary.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    And with a captured SCOTUS and ineffective congress the republicans will make sure she gets nothing done. Assuming there’s even an election.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    If this is “plotting”, then I am all for this “villain” to win. The wording of the headline implies that AOC is a bad thing, when we got…waves at orange fuckwit

    Anyhow, if given the choice between AOC and Newsom, AOC all the way.

      • DarthFreyr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I think “plotting” doesn’t see a ton of use in that more neutral sense outside of a few idiomatic cases like “plotting a course”. I definitely did not naturally associate a presidential run with that navigational sense of “plotting”, but instead the “plotting an evil scheme” connotation jumped out. I’d think of planning a presidential run to be more similar in activity to plotting a scheme, another literal plan of actions to achieve a goal, than to plotting a course as a figurative map of those actions. That’s why I interpreted pretty sharply that way, at least.

        • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 minutes ago

          Since the article is about her considering multiple options - Senate or President - that she’ll have to narrow down to a single path, the navigation implication seems relevant.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Yeah I was honestly surprised to see how many people in this thread interpret “plotting” as inherently negative.

        • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s both, but in journalism, you pick your words carefully. There’s no chance the writer of the headline wasn’t fully aware of both connotations. There are a dozen other words that could have meant the same thing without making it sound nefarious.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I am guessing it is due to politics inherently being a skulduggery kind of thing, especially with mainstream media being in the pocket of the wealthy. If our news outlets had a reputation of being fair and truthful, their wording wouldn’t be treated with suspicion.

          As an American, I have to turn many statements like a rotisserie and think whether they make sense. They cannot be trusted if left raw.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Anyhow, if given the choice between AOC and Newsom, AOC all the way.

      Uggg I guess I’m same… But effing dems will go with the more fascist option everytime so we’ll get Newsom for sure…

  • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Nah. She’s politically what the country needs, but get serious, no way will America ever vote a woman as President.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        And 30% of the fucking country proceeded to lose their gotdamn minds about it.

        While another 30% declared we had “defeated racism” and decided it’s okay to halt all efforts to remediate past racial bias or prevent future racial bias in the system.

        Sorry; unmedicated.

    • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      We should let the Democratic party choose a person through a primary to run for president and then allow that person to run for president.

      If a woman makes it through that process on her own merits then the party will probably vote for her.

      If on the other hand a woman is selected because she’s a woman who will cooperate with the donors and they decide to skip that process or subvert it in some way then you probably won’t win.

      • Ocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Why would anyone do that when you can just complain about needing change, but do absolutely nothing to support or advocate for it! Or better yet, you can just start applying uninformed purity tests to progressive candidates. “She wants to implement the change I want to see, but because I don’t understand how legislation is passed in the US, I’ll accuse her of giving money to Israel’s occupation, and say she’s complicit in genocide” - average internet leftist.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Usually it is said that someone is ‘contemplating’ or ‘planning’ a run for office, but since it’s about a woman the headline says ‘plotting’ because that sounds underhanded and nefarious and the media wants to get the framing in place early.

    That said, I think it would be better for her to run to replace Schumer in the Senate. A better chance to win and could do more good there.

    • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 minutes ago

      I suspect poor headline editing. The article is about multiple options (Senate, President, other party-promoting path) where the navigational use of the term (“plotting a course”) is reasonable. But then the headline couldn’t fit even two options, so it got reduced to just President and no one on the team connected that plotting has a negative implication with a single subject.

  • SarcasticMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Look if she comes out of the box swinging, and I mean haymakers both left and right, she could do it. The DNC has to have an honest to god real primary and not the horse shit they pulled with Bernie or the last-minute Harris takeover.

    If AOC wins a primary and is nominated, hits the ground at a full sprint, doesn’t pull punches on either side of the political spectrum, prays to Jah, and crosses her fingers she could do a Billy Clint or Obama. She is going to have to learn to play the Saxophone, confess to smoking weed and inhaling, slow jam the news, and probably host a full episode of SNL not just appear as herself in a sketch. If she did all that and she convinces Jesus to come down from on high and endorse her she has a 50/50 chance.

    Oh, and she’ll need a gun for her purse like that bargain bin Barbie from Colorado or the dude from Georgia’s 14th congressional district.

      • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        She might run if she believes it would steer the conversation in a productive way, even if she didn’t believe she could win a primary.

      • thelivefive@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah I would definitely support her but I don’t know why you have downvotes. The fascist have been running character hit pieces on her and misinformation campaigns for like a decade now non stop. Also America has shown it’s true colors by electing Trump twice. I just don’t know how people think we go from an open racist to a women of color without major election reform. Which is happening. Just in the wrong direction. What reality are y’all living in where she has a chance? I hope I’m wrong but just from looking at the current state of things… I know people are somewhat fed up with things, but the idea that they’ll pull their heads out of their racist asses by that time seems ludicrous.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If AOC is the candidate, it will be the first time since Bernie that I will phone bank, knock down doors, canvas … Whatever it takes.

    She is one of the few people in politics that I can get behind.