• theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    If China’s already at 5nm, they’re getting close. Smallest in use now is 3nm, I think.

    This poses the question, how long until China can achieve its goals without Taiwan and TSMC?

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      If they do then they will likely invade Taiwan. The threat of America blowing up TSMC to prevent if from falling into China’s hands, and nuking the world economy, is what is stopping China from invading. Once China has it’s own advanced semiconductor industry there will immediately be war.

      • m532@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The only reason I can see for china to invade china 2 is if usa places nukes there

        • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          China views the unification of the Chinese people as key to it’s prosperity. Just like with Hong Kong and Macau. They’ve also explicitly said they intend to invade Taiwan if peaceful unification is impossible.

          • m532@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So you said the same as me, but framed like a cia stenographer would. Why tho? You gain something from convincing people that china bad?

            • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I didn’t say the same as you, and I’m not trying to convince anyone that China’s bad. China views Taiwan as an inextricable part of China.

      • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I always saw it as TSMC potentially being a key reason for China to invade Taiwan so they get their hands on semiconductors, with this being LESS likely now, instead of more, because China no longer needs TSMC and their research.

        • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          China’s overtures towards Taiwan have nothing to do with semiconductors. They see Taiwan as an inextricable part of their nation.

          • Grapho@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Because it is. They’ve also made it very clear that they intend to follow a path of peaceful unification and the only reason that hasn’t happened already is because of US meddling and military threats.

            • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              I don’t agree with that.

              Taiwan hasn’t been part of China since before the CCP came to power. China is doing just fine without Taiwan and Taiwan doesn’t seem to want to join China.

              • theshatterstone54@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                It seems you’re mostly right (except there are rumours that a Taiwan takeover is part of China’s long term plan for economic dominance).

                I’m worried at how many China shills there are around here.

                • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I’m a soft China shill myself, I just don’t agree with their intended invasion of Taiwan (among other policies) nor the ethnonationalist-like beliefs underlying it.