• SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Skipped to the “ugly” part of the article and I kind of agree with the language being hard?

    I think a bigger problem is that it’s hard to find “best practices” because information is just scattered everywhere and search engines are terrible.

    Like, the language itself is fairly simple and the tutorial is good. But it’s a struggle when it comes to doing things like “how do I change the source of a package”, “how do I compose two modules together” and “how do I add a repo to a flake so it’s visible in my config”. Most of this information comes from random discourse threads where the responder assumes you have a working knowledge of the part of the codebase they’re taking about.

  • ThisDayForwardBetty@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Agreed with the article. There’s lots to dislike about Nix, but even with those downsides, NixOS is still better than any OS I’ve tried. Install an update and it’s borked? No worries. New PC and you want everything set up just like your old one? Copy one file over and it’s set up for you.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Copy one file over and it’s set up for you.

      So, I’ve only played around with NixOS on a Raspberry Pi, but… Don’t people usually split their config up in multiple files, and then store than in a Git repository?

      The process then still is: check out that Git repository, except there’s another step: copy over your private key so that you can decrypt your secrets.

      Is that correct? Or did I make things needlessly complex for myself?

      • dblsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t have any secrets in my config or a private key or anything and I’m currently running 4 servers from the same config (it used to be 8 or even more machines at some point even, including desktops).

        But yes, it’s a multi-file config, it would be absolutely crazy to not split it up with how large it is.

  • traches@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I like the idea of nixos, but I feel like it makes a bunch of daily sacrifices in order to optimize a task I do once every few years? I hardly ever get a new computer, but I install/uninstall/update/tweak packages on my system all the time. With a dotfile manager and snapshots, I get most of the benefit without any of the drawbacks.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You only have one machine? I benefit from sharing configs between the laptop and the desktop. They are not the same, but I can easily copy paste a complex service I defined in my desktop to do the same thing on my laptop

      • traches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I have a desktop, laptop, and a few VMs and servery things. Dotfile manager (yadm, which is a git wrapper) to sync personal settings, everything else I just do manually. The system-level configs are either different enough that standardizing them isn’t very helpful, or no more complicated than installing packages and activating services.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Activating services is the specific task NixOS is great at, you can just add it and it downloads the packages and starts it and generates the configs

          • traches@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I’ll probably switch eventually I’m just trying to talk myself out of it because I don’t have the time to learn right now