I can’t believe I’m mentioning svelte kit file structure twice in like a week. I made an example to show in another comment but when I tried to copy and paste here it escaped Ann the characters, so here is a link

https://lemmy.zip/comment/21657580

Edit: I got it. The / at the end are not part of the name, they are just to show that they are folders

routes/
+page.ts
(admin)/
  +page.ts
  [user=uuid]/
    [[community]]/
      +page.ts
    posts/
      [...postIds@]/
        +page.ts

“mas o memos bien” by “El Mató a un Policía Motorizado”. It’s in Spanish, but the songs tells everyone (gf, friends, mother, even a stranger) that everything will be fine and not to worry and that goes " dad, I need money to make everything fine". Like wtf. Don’t go around promising solutions and then ask someone else to fix all your shit

I hace to believe they are joking. No one who eriously says that it must be bombed would then be careful in their actual call to violence (he said “we need to emotionally harm the person responsible”. The fact that they said “emotionally” to me suggest that they were avoiding getting into trouble. So the rest was not said seriously)

Oh. No. You win. Mine is a gut feeling that modeling all routes with folders would become a paid. To navigate and manage, while you have actual experience

Im trying it out yet. It seems fun, the tutorial is amazing. I don’t think I’d want to do large enterprise projects with it

Don’t try svelte kit. This is pseudocode but it’s valid. The only symbol show here that is not real is the / that I’ve placed at the end of folder to show that they are folders. There are other special cases

routes/
+page.ts
(admin)/
  +page.ts
  [user=uuid]/
    [[community]]/
      +page.ts
    posts/
      [...postIds@]/
        +page.ts

Xkcd

Well. So am i

That is not how I read it. If he had shot and left a note saying “fuck billionaires” or “fuck CEOs” then it would be terrorism because he would be threatening them. But his problem was just this guy. It was plain murder / revenge.

The internet made him a champion of “anti billionaires” against his will

Really? What makes you say that? Is it like a trend or something?

Lol. It’s you again. The “þ” person. I just checked my comments to make sure you were the same user. It’s hilarious to identify you by this character. Did you figure out what causes it?

Ok. I’m not from the US and thought this was obvious. Is anyone in favor of undocumented or illegal immigrants? I thought the actual problem was deportations with no trials. It seems obvious no one should support illegal immigration. I think instead you should support allowing more people to inmigrate

I did some quick googling and found this. I haven’t looked too much into it yet, but it doesn’t sound like such a bad reason on the surface, although I do suspect things should be better now

From their website in the section titled “Privacy over convenience”

One of the main considerations often ignored in security and privacy comparisons between messaging applications is multi-device access. For example, in Signal’s case, the Sesame protocol used to support multi-device access has the vulnerability that is explained in detail here:

“We present an attack on the post-compromise security of the Signal messenger that allows to stealthily register a new device via the Sesame protocol. […] This new device can send and receive messages without raising any ‘Bad encrypted message’ errors. Our attack thus shows that the Signal messenger does not guarantee post-compromise security at all in the multi-device setting”.

Solutions are possible, and even the quoted paper proposes improvements, but they are not implemented in any existing communication solutions. Unfortunately this results in most communication systems, even those in the privacy space, having compromised security in multi-device settings due to these limitations. That’s the reason we are not rushing a full multi-device support, and currently only provide the ability to use mobile app profiles via the desktop app, while they are on the same network.

The main Dev gave a talk somewhere sometime where he explained why doing multi device is a security risk. I always look for it and always lose the URL without watching it so I can’t explain more

Private and anonymous are different things. While anonymity does increase privacy, it is not a strict requirement. So it this private, but not as private as possible.

The best private messenger IMO is simplex, but it not production ready yet

It depends on the project. If you are making a code editor / ice then yes. Your project may not support working with assembly files. Sure, they are just plaintext (I think? Or are they binary? I think I might be confusing assembler source files and complied files which are machine code), but you get no tooling like autocomplete, go to definition, etc